As the bloodshed continues in the Middle East , the search for a reasonable
solution must come to grips with the real cause of the conflict. Most Americans
believe that even if both sides are at fault, the Palestinians are unreasonable
terrorists who have no point of view worth listening to. Really!
My position, however, is that the
Palestinians have a real live grievance: their homeland for over a thousand
years was taken, without their consent and by force, during the creation of the
state of Israel . And all future
crimes, by both sides are birthed from this original injustice.
This post outlines the history of Palestine to show how this
process occurred and what a moral solution to the region’s problems should
consist of. If you care about the people of the Middle East , Jewish and Arab,
you owe it to yourself to read this account of the other side of the historical
record.
The bullshit Zionist position is that they
showed up in Palestine late in the19th
century to repossess their ancestral homeland. Jews bought land and started
building up the Jewish community there. They were met with violent opposition
from the Palestinian Arabs; I assume stemming from the Arabs’ hate of Jews. The
Zionists were then forced to defend themselves, and in one form or another,
this same situation continues up to right now!!
The problem with this sorry ass explanation
is that it’s simply not true.
What really happened was that the Zionist,
from the beginning, looked forward to a practically complete removal of the native
Arab population so that Israel could be a wholly
Jewish state or as much as was possible. Land bought by the Jewish National
Fund was held in the name of the Jewish people and could never be sold or even
leased back to Arabs (this same shit continues today).
The Arab community, as it became more and
more aware of the Zionists’ intentions, persistently opposed further Jewish
immigration and land buying because it posed a clear and present danger to the
very existence of Arab society in Palestine . Because of this
opposition, the entire Zionist project never could have been realized without
the military backing of the British.
A huge majority of
the population of Palestine , by the way, had
been Arabic since the seventh century A.D. (Over 1300 years) Hum?
In short, Zionism was based on a flawed,
colonialist world view, that the rights of the native inhabitants didn’t matter
one bit. The Arabs’ opposition to Zionism wasn’t really based on anti-Semitism,
but on a totally reasonable fear of the removal of their people.
One further point: my Jewish friends say
that my position is very critical of Zionism but is in no way anti-Semitic. Hum
again? I don’t believe that the Jews acted worse than any other group might
have acted in their situation. The Zionists had an understandable desire to
establish a place where Jews could be masters of their own destiny, given the
history of Jewish oppression. Especially as the danger to European Jewry crystallized
in 1937 and after, the actions of the Zionists featured real desperation.
But so were the actions of the Arabs. The
mythic land without people for a people without land was already home to
700,000 Palestinians in 1919. This is the root of the problem, as we are
witnessing right now!!
No comments:
Post a Comment